Shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line. This is the cornerstone for some styles to the extent that they do not even have any circular hits in their arsenal (e.g hooks or uppercuts).
While the principle is correct mathematically, applying it 100% of the time is kind of crazy to me. As examples:
- the shortest distance from the 10th floor to the ground level may be to jump off the building but not many people can live to see the next day
- going around a cement wall probably take less time and effort than trying to brute force through it
- if straight line is always the best, you will not see “golf swings” but “golf pokes”
- many knockouts are indeed from straight punches like crosses but there are enough knockouts also from hooks, uppercuts, hay-makers, spinning back fist and more that even if you choose not to use them, you have to be prepared for it
- an indirect sneak attack may be more effective than a straight frontal attack if the enemy cannot see it
In combat, distance is indeed a necessary consideration but NOT THE ONLY consideration. Ultimately, effectiveness in different situations is our key driver and goal. Therefore, in learning kung fu, don’t just recite and follow styles. Understand the underlying principle, know its assumptions and limitations and then apply it as appropriate.
Exercise (email or facebook me)
- Should we avoid the full frontal straight line?
- Tell me the pros and cons of straight line AND circular lines and maybe examples of when you use which.
Shortest distance between 2 points
Comments are closed.